Jean Burns

Jean E. Burns

127 Williams St #1

San Leandro, CA 94577 USA

Tel.: (510) 614-2383


I am a physicist with interests in the following subjects: thermodynamics and the nature of entropy; consciousness and free will and their relationship to presently known physical laws; parapsychology and the relationship of psi phenomena to presently known physical laws. More specifically, my interests and themes in my publications are as follows.

In physics the second law of thermodynamics (that entropy must always increase, subject to constraints on the system) is often considered an absolute, in which the distribution of variables that describe the entropy, such as momentum, must randomize in a few molecular collision times, regardless of whether any randomizing agent can be described at the molecular level. I have shown that entropy increase can be accounted for in gases and liquids by the randomizing effect of vacuum radiation on the momentum distribution of the molecules, over a broad range of temperatures and pressures. This result makes it plausible that entropy increase generally arises from the randomizing effect of vacuum radiation. If entropy increase depends on a physical mechanism, it also makes it plausible that some quantum mechanical systems, such as those at low temperature or with special conditions, may not be susceptible to this effect. This conclusion would explain the finding of some researchers that some quantum systems of the above types do not follow the second law. (Papers of 1998, 2002d, 2007.)

I am interested in the study of consciousness and have made several reviews of models which relate consciousness to physical laws (1990, 1991b, 1996, 1999). In particular, I have examined the possibility of free will, viewed as a physical effect produced by non-physical means, and have shown that in all the models which propose that it occurs, a radical extension would have to be made to presently known physical laws to account for its action (1999).

I have also proposed that mental action, in addition to producing free will at the conscious level, can act at the unconscious level to select between brain programs to provide details of our physical actions. I have also reviewed other models of consciousness which make similar proposals (1986, 1991a, 1991b, 2010b).

I have also reviewed psi phenomena with respect to their relationship to presently known physical laws, and have shown that a radical extension of these laws would have to be made to explain these phenomena (1993a, 2003).

I have proposed a model by which mental action can be produced by the ordering of quantum fluctuations. (The extension to physical laws would be, in this model, the possibility of ordering the usually random quantum fluctuations.) The root mean square effect of quantum fluctuations on the momentum of a molecule is very small over a mean free path. However, this effect is greatly magnified when molecules interact at the end of a mean free path. I have shown that through this effect the direction of travel of a water molecule in the intercellular medium in the brain can be changed to any desired direction in one mean free path. The impact of 400 ordered molecules at thermal velocity is sufficient to open an ion gate in a sodium channel. More than one ion gate must be opened to produce an action potential, and several action potentials might be needed to initiate a physical action. (Presumably the brain produces programs for the action, and only the action potentials to initiate the programs are necessary to carry it out.) I estimate that about 4,000 molecules must be ordered to initiate a physical action, not very many (2002a, 2006).

With respect to psychokinesis (PK) I have shown that 10,000 ordered molecules would be sufficient to produce a detectable response in a small (area of 10 mm2), sensitive microphone. This number is somewhat higher than the number of ordered molecules needed to initiate a free will action, but not greatly so. Therefore, it can be expected that some good psi producers would be able to produce such an effect, and this prediction can be used for an experimental test of the PK part of my model (2002a, 2006).

I have also shown that previous experimental results in the PK deviation of a tumbling cube can be accounted for by the impact of 2x105 ordered molecules on the cube at the beginning of its trajectory (2002b, 2002c).


(in press), The action of the mind. In I. Fredriksson (Ed.), Aspects of the Mind. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

(2011), Using psychokinesis to explore the nature of quantum randomness. In D.P. Sheehan (Ed.), Quantum Retrocausation: Theory and Experiment (pp. 279-290). Melville, NY: AIP Conference Proceedings.

(2010a), Cumulative effect of vacuum radiation on particle coordinates. In R.L. Amoroso, P. Rowlands, and S. Jeffers (Eds.), Search for Fundamental Theory (pp. 43-47). Melville, NY: AIP Conference Proceedings.

(2010b), What does the mind do that the brain does not? In R.L. Amoroso (Ed.), The Complementarity of Mind and Body: Fulfilling the Dream of Descartes, Einstein and Eccles (pp. 117-134). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

(2007), Vacuum radiation, entropy, and molecular chaos, Foundations of Physics, 37, 1727-1737.

(2006), The arrow of time and the action of the mind at the molecular level, in D.P. Sheehan (Ed.), Frontiers of Time: Retrocausation – Experiment and Theory(Melville, NY: AIP Conference Proceedings), pp. 75-88. <> <>

(2005), Detection of staring – psi or statistical artifact? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(6), 71-75.

(2003), Co-Editor (with J. Alcock and A. Freeman), Psi Wars (Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic).

(2003), What is beyond the edge of the known world? in J. Alcock, J.E. Burns, and A. Freeman (Eds.), Psi Wars (Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic), pp. 7-28. Reprinted (2008), in R.M. Schoch and L. Yonavjak (Eds.), The Parapsychology Revolution (New York: Tarcher).

(2002a), Quantum fluctuations and the action of the mind, Noetic Journal, 3(4), 312-317.


(2002b), The tumbling cube and the action of the mind, Noetic Journal, 3(4), 318-329.


(2002c), The effect of ordered air molecules on a tumbling cube, Noetic Journal, 3(4), 330-339.


(2002d), Vacuum radiation, entropy and the arrow of time, in R.L. Amoroso, G. Hunter, M. Kafatos, and J.-P. Vigier (Eds.), Gravitation and Cosmology (London: Kluwer Academic), pp. 491-498. <>

(1999), Volition and physical laws, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(10), 27-47.


(1998), Entropy and vacuum radiation, Foundations of Physics, 28, 1191-1207.

(1996), The possibility of empirical test of hypotheses about consciousness, in S.R. Hameroff, A.W. Kaszniak, and A.C. Scott (Eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 739-742.

(1994), Spaciousness: The common ground between science and spirituality, in R.‑I. Heinze (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on the Study of Shamanism and Alternative Modes of Healing (Independent Scholars of Asia), pp. 5‑12. <>

(1993a), Current hypotheses about the nature of the mind-brain relationship and their relationship to findings in parapsychology, in K.R. Rao (Ed.), Cultivating Consciousness (New York: Praeger), pp. 139‑148.

(1993b), Time, consciousness, and psi, in B. Kane, J. Millay and D. Brown (Eds.), Silver Threads: 25 Years of Parapsychology Research (New York: Praeger), pp. 124‑136.

(1993c), The predictive possibilities of a card code, in R.‑I. Heinze (Ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on the Study of Shamanism and Alternative Modes of Healing (Independent Scholars of Asia), pp. 59‑66. <>

(1991a), Does consciousness perform a function independently of the brain? Frontier Perspectives 2(1), 19‑34 (Philadelphia, PA: Center for Frontier Sciences,Temple University).

(1991b), Contemporary models of consciousness: Part II, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 12, 407‑420.

(1990), Contemporary models of consciousness: Part I, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11, 153‑172.

(1986), Consciousness and psi, Psi Research, 5, 166‑205.


1994 to present

Associate Editor

Journal of Consciousness Studies, United Kingdom


I believe in the importance of networking for research in consciousness, so people from a number of fields can interact. To that end I helped form several multidisciplinary discussion groups on consciousness in the San Francisco Bay Area.

In 1990 Ravi Gomatam (a researcher in philosophy of science at the Bhaktivedanta Institute, Berkeley, CA) and I founded the Consciousness and Science Discussion Group, which presented talks on the subject of consciousness in San Francisco, California, over a period of twelve years. Researchers from a variety of fields, including artificial intelligence, physics, biology, psychology, and parapsychology, made presentations at these meetings.

In 1988 Bernard Baars (a cognitive psychologist then at the Wright Institute, Berkeley, CA) and I started the Consciousness Research Group, an informal multidisciplinary group in which the attendees had a strong research interest in consciousness. A member or invited colleague gave a presentation at each monthly meeting. Meetings continued until 1990.


Ph.D. (Physics), 1970

University of Hawaii, Honolulu

B.A. (Physics)

University of California, Berkeley